lect17 fin
This commit is contained in:
@@ -285,4 +285,65 @@ Connor Nature 2005, N&V on Quiroga et al:
|
||||
|
||||
sparse and non-variant
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Short-term plasticity of the gill-withdrawal reflex in sea slugs
|
||||
|
||||
Facilitation in the marine mollusk *Aplysia californica*
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.03-1R_copy_3f9f1c7.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.3</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.03-2R_copy_2b59a30.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.3, Squire and Kandel 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.03-3R_copy_0fbd016.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.3, Squire and Kandel 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.03-4R_copy_784bb55.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.3, Squire and Kandel 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
Squire and Kandel. *Memory: From Mind to Molecules* 1999
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Epilepsy
|
||||
|
||||
Disorder characterized by periodic seizures from synchronous firing of large groups of neurons in the nervous system. Kindling and synaptic plasticity plays a role.
|
||||
|
||||
<figure><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Box-08C-0_57467fe.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Box 8C, Dyro 1989</figcaption></figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Reid et al., Prog Neurobiol 2009
|
||||
Scheffer adn Berkovic Trends Pharm Sci 2003
|
||||
McNamara et al., STKE 2006
|
||||
Engel 2008, *Epilepsy: A Comprehensive Textbook*
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Synaptic mechanisms of short-term sensitization in sea slugs
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.04-1R_copy_840c43d.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.4</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.04-2R_copy_7c288a4.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.4, Squire and Kandel 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.04-3R_copy_9e8b3eb.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.4, Squire and Kandel 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
Squire and Kandel. *Memory: From Mind to Molecules* 1999
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Molecular signals underlying short- and long-term sensitization in *Aplysia*
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.05-1R_copy_1739967.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.5, Squire and Kandel 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><figcaption class="big">persistent PKA (green)
|
||||
unindentified proteins responsible for synaptic growth (yellow)
|
||||
</figcaption><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.05-2R_copy_2b6b868.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.5, Squire and Kandel 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
Squire and Kandel. *Memory: From Mind to Molecules* 1999
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## CamKII signaling in a dendritic spine during LTP
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.11-1R_d67561b.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.11</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.11-2R_f40021e.jpg" height="100px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.11, Lee et al., *Nature* 2009</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ PVN– paraventricular nucleus of hypothalamus. Contains groups of neurons activ
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Long term potentiation (LTP) in the amygdala
|
||||
## Long term potentiation (LTP)
|
||||
|
||||
<figure><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.09-0r_17f2f6b.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.9</figcaption></figure>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -368,6 +368,8 @@ TODO: review this figure legend
|
||||
|
||||
NMDA receptor opening leads to strengthening of synapses
|
||||
|
||||
**LTP in the amygdala**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Insertion of more AMPA receptors in synapse
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1 +1,388 @@
|
||||
## Synaptic plasticity
|
||||
## Synaptic plasticity
|
||||
|
||||
* Synaptic connectivity between neurons is not static– it is dynamic
|
||||
* The ability of a neuron to adjust its synaptic excitability in response to incoming neural signals (i.e. synaptic transmission) is called synaptic plasticity
|
||||
|
||||
**Plasticity**
|
||||
: *the quality of being easily shaped or molded*
|
||||
: *the adaptability of an organism to changes in its environment*
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
structural vs functional connectivity
|
||||
|
||||
* The influence one neuron has on another through a chemical synapse can be changed
|
||||
|
||||
Non-volatile memory digital storage: NAND flash memory (SSDs), hard disk drives, floppy disks, and magnetic tape), optical discs, punch cards
|
||||
|
||||
NAND logic gates is used to map data in SSDs
|
||||
|
||||
from [wikipedia flash memory page](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_memory):
|
||||
>NAND flash also uses floating-gate transistors, but they are connected in a way that resembles a NAND gate: several transistors are connected in series, and the bit line is pulled low only if all the word lines are pulled high
|
||||
|
||||
floating-gate MOSFET (FGMOS)
|
||||
: is a field-effect transistor
|
||||
: gate of the FGMOS is electrically isolated
|
||||
: results in a floating node in DC
|
||||
: secondary gates or inputs are deposited above the floating gate (FG)
|
||||
: the secondary gates are also electrically isolated from it and only only capacitively connected to the FG
|
||||
: because the FG is surrounded by material of high resistance, the charge contained in it can remain unchanged for long periods of time
|
||||
|
||||
metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET)
|
||||
: a transistor used for amplifying or switching electronic signals
|
||||
: most common transistor in digital and analog circuits
|
||||
|
||||
field-effect transistor (FET)
|
||||
: a transistor using an electric field to control electrical conductivity of a channel for charge carrying in a semiconductor material
|
||||
: Julius Edgar Lilienfeld in 1925
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
## Synaptic connectivity
|
||||
|
||||
<div style="font-size:0.7em">
|
||||
<div></div>
|
||||
|
||||
If connectivity is defined as an association or link between two nodes (e.g. two neurons, two brain areas, two people), how do we define *connectivity* in neuronal networks?
|
||||
|
||||
* Structural connectivity– the physical wiring diagram of the nervous system (i.e. the spatial location of the nodes and their wires in the circuit. The location/juxtaposition of synapses between pairs of neurons)
|
||||
* Functional connectivity– the presence of a functional association/link in the neural activity between two nodes in the nervous system
|
||||
* Maybe a direct connection (A --> B) or indirect (A --> C --> B)
|
||||
* The strength of synaptic coupling or 'weight' for the structural connection between node A and B. (e.g. node A has a positive effect on node B's probability action potential generation)
|
||||
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* c. elegans is the only complete physical wiring diagram we have for an organism
|
||||
* but we don't have a functional wiring diagram for even c. elegans
|
||||
|
||||
* direct vs indirect connections-- monosynaptic vs di– tri– synaptic circuits
|
||||
|
||||
* DTI vs fMRI
|
||||
* antero- retrograde tracing (muscle fibers to alpha motor neuron pools) vs patch clamp recordings
|
||||
|
||||
*water pipe resistance example for strength weight of inlfluence to work/effort. Amount of effort need*. I=V/R. I=gV. need sufficient EPSC and associated EPSP to depolarize neuron enough to generate a spike.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Short-term synaptic plasticity
|
||||
|
||||
facilitation:
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.01-1R_copy_c4e008f.jpg" height="300px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.1, Charlton and Bittner *J Gen Physiol* 1978</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.01-2R_copy_7efffef.jpg" height="300px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.1, Charlton and Bittner *J Gen Physiol* 1978</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
squid gian synapse. pair of presynaptic APs elictit two epsps that show facilitation. IF two more APs within msecs of ea other. 10s of msec plasticity.
|
||||
|
||||
Likly due to prolonged elecvation of pre-synaptic clacium levels after synaptic activity (Ca2+ buffering/extrusion to resting levels is slow)
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
## Short-term synaptic plasticity
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
synaptic depression and augmentation:
|
||||
<div><figcaption class="big">squid giant synapse</figcaption><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.01-3R_copy_a81a0df.jpg" height="300px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.1, Swandulla 1991</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><figcaption class="big">frog neuromuscular synapse</figcaption><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.01-4R_copy_f5730b9.jpg" height="300px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.1, Betz *J. Physiol* 1970</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
1. strong and fast depression from high frequency stimulus and depression of epsps at squid giant synapse
|
||||
2. slower depression mixed with augmentation seenn when lowering external Ca2+ concentration
|
||||
3. augmentation alone after further reducing Ca2+ levels
|
||||
|
||||
* synaptic depression causes NT release to decline during sustained synaptic activity
|
||||
* depression caused by progressive deplection of synaptic vesicle pool that is available (vesicle depletion under high freq stimulation)
|
||||
|
||||
* augmentation incr amount of transmitetr released from presnypatic termainals (over a few seconds)
|
||||
* potentiation same but over tens of secs to minutes
|
||||
* thought to arise from prolonged elevation of presynaptic calcium levels durin synaptic plasticity
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
## Short-term synaptic plasticity
|
||||
|
||||
post-tetanic potentiation (at spinal motor neuron synapse):
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.01-5R_copy_aac2681.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.1, Lev-Tov *J. Neurophysiol* 1983</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Short-term plasticity at the neuromuscular synapse
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.02-1R_copy_399cdb3.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.2, Katz and Miledi *J. Physiol* 1966</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.02-2R_copy_e167ce2.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.2, Malenka and Siegelbaum *Synapes* 2001</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* train of stimulait appoled to presynaptic motor nerve prod changes in EPP amplitude
|
||||
* dynamic changes in transmitter release caused by severl forms of short term plasticity
|
||||
|
||||
* facilitation and augmenation first, followed by pronounced synaptic depression. Potentation begins late in stimulat train and persitst form many secs after end of stimulus-- leading to post-tetanic potentiation
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Hippocampus anatomy
|
||||
|
||||
Hippocampal circuits are used for studying the physiological basis of synaptic plasticity and memory.
|
||||
|
||||
<figure><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.06_63eafc7.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.6</figcaption></figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Potentiation of synaptic responses in hippocampal pyramidal neurons
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.07-1R_copy_500c602.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.7, Malinow *Science* 1989</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.07-2R_copy_178b51a.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.7, Malinow *Science* 1989</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Potentiation of synaptic responses in hippocampal pyramidal neurons
|
||||
|
||||
<div><figcaption class="big">Long term potentiation</figcaption><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.07-3R_copy_847eedc.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.7, Malinow *Science* 1989</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><figcaption class="big">Long term potentiation in vivo</figcaption><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.07-4R_copy_c736775.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.7, Abraham *J. Neurosci* 2002</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* called long term potentiation
|
||||
|
||||
* 3R LTP of tetanized pathway
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Long term potentiation (LTP)
|
||||
|
||||
* Paired pre- and post-synaptic activity causes LTP
|
||||
* NMDA receptor antagonists block LTP
|
||||
|
||||
<figure><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.08-0_642969e.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.8, Gustafsson *J. Neurosci* 1987</figcaption></figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
Lomo and Bliss 1960s in Per Andersen's lab at Oslo.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## NMDA receptors open only during depolarization
|
||||
|
||||
<figure><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.10-0_59fb457.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.10, Nicoll 1988</figcaption></figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
Nicoll Philos Trans Roy Soc Lond B 2003
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Important properties of LTP
|
||||
|
||||
* Spatial localization (synaptic input specificity)
|
||||
* Associativity (between synapses within the post-synaptic neuron)
|
||||
|
||||
<figure><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.09-0r_17f2f6b.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.9</figcaption></figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* Properties consistent with role as specific coincidence detector
|
||||
* Not generalized across whole neuronal ensembles, but localized
|
||||
* Associativity utilized for associative learning or classical/Pavlovian conditioning (great early 20c russian physiologist, Pavlov's dogs (dinner bell association with food presentation and salivation))
|
||||
|
||||
at Schaffer collateral axon synapse betwen CA3 and CA1
|
||||
|
||||
* NMDA receptor opening leads to strengthening of synapses
|
||||
* weak stimulation at pathway 2 can lead to synapse strengthening/potentiation through associative mechanisms-- EPSP summation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Increased amplitude of AMPA mediated EPSCs after LTP
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.12-1R_5f07fe5.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.12, Matsuzaki *Nature* 2004</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.12-2R_88aaff5.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.12, Matsuzaki *Nature* 2004</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.12-3R_6993118.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.12, Liao 1995</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* spatial maps of gluatamate mediated EPSC amplitudes before and after LTP induction
|
||||
* timecourse of changes in glutamate sensitivity. Lasts >60min
|
||||
* LTP induces AMPA receptors responses at silent synapses. Before, no EPScs elicited at -65mV. After LTP induction, same stimulus produces EPSCs mediated by AMPA-R
|
||||
|
||||
It is more than just presence or absence of NMDA receptors. Cnidarians (jellyfish, anemones), drosophilia express NMDA receptors (Ryan and Grant Nat Rev Neurosci 2009).
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
## Silent synapses
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Box-08B-1R_copy_556c434.jpg" height="300px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Box 8B, Liao *Nature* 1995</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Box-08B-2R_copy_c8c8a41.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Box 8B, M. Ehlers</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Box-08B-3R_copy_230f3bf.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Box 8B, Petralia *Nat Neurosci* 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
-->
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Box-08B-4R_copy_6149610.jpg" height="300px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Box 8B</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Molecular signaling mechanisms underlying LTP
|
||||
|
||||
<div style="font-size:0.8em">
|
||||
<div></div>
|
||||
|
||||
* Ca<sup>2+</sup> influx
|
||||
* Ca<sup>2+</sup>/Calmodulin kinase II (CaMKII) and protein kinase C (PKC)
|
||||
* Protein substrate phosphorylation
|
||||
* Insertion of more AMPA receptors in synapse
|
||||
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
<figure><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.13-0_b08c55e.jpg" height="300px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.13</figcaption></figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## LTP dependends on post-synaptic protein synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.14-0_copy_854f793.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.14, Frey and Moriss Nature 1997</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* treatment with anisomycin, inhibitor of protein synthesis causes LTP to decay instead of being persistent over long periods
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Long-lasting synaptic plasticity after LTP
|
||||
|
||||
Long-lasting LTP is result of PKA activation of the transcriptional regulator CREB, leading to transcriptional regulation and changes in synapse structure.
|
||||
|
||||
<div><figcaption class="big">Molecular signaling during early and late phases of LTP induced synapse plasticity</figcaption><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.15-1R_c375165.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.15, Squire and Kandel 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Long-lasting synaptic plasticity after LTP
|
||||
|
||||
Spine growth and creation– LTP can induce formation of new synapses between neurons.
|
||||
|
||||
<div><figcaption class="big">New dendritic spines (white arrows) in rodent pyramidal neurons ~1hr after LTP</figcaption><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.15-2R_copy_9d9732f.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.15, Engert and Bonhoeffer *Nature* 1999</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
- organotypic slice cultures of rat hippocampus, 2P imaging, fluorescent dye fills with patch pipette (calcein), and local superfusion technique
|
||||
- schaffer collateral stimulation to make EPSPs and induce LTP. Transmitter release blocked everywhere (10 mM Cd2+, 0.8mM Ca2+) except a local domain perfused with normal superfusion solution
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Long-term synaptic depression (LTD)
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.16-1R_copy_a980ce0.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.16</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.16-2R_copy_62a434c.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.16, Mulkey *Science* 1993</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* at the CA3-CA1 synapse in hippocampus
|
||||
* low frequency stimulation (1Hz) in Schaffer collaterals induces LTD of synaptic transmission
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Long-term synaptic depression (LTD)
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.16-3R_copy_b0e0f95.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.16</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* NMDA-R still required, but a low-amplitude rise in [Ca2+] activates protein phosphatases instead of kinases
|
||||
* results in internalization of AMPA-R, decreasing glutamate sensitivity and lower EPSC amplitudes
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## LTD plasticity at Purkinje neuron synapses in cerebellum
|
||||
|
||||
LTD at cerebellar synapses.
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.17-1R_copy_768ab77.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.17</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.17-2R_copy_3c60fba.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.17, Sakurai *J Physiol* 1987</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* record purkinje neuron, stim climbing fibers
|
||||
* pair sitmulus of CF and parallel fibers cuases LTD that reduces parallel fiber induced EPSPs in purkinje neurons
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
*LTP can also occur at purkinje neuron synapses, but requires endocannabinoid retrograde signaling to presynaptic climbing fibers*
|
||||
|
||||
--
|
||||
|
||||
## Cerebellar circuits
|
||||
|
||||
<figure><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-19.10-0_copy_93cfd72.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neurosciencer 5e Fig. 19.10</figcaption></figure>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
- inferior olive
|
||||
- largest nucleus in medulla
|
||||
- olivocerebellar fibers refered to as climbing fibers
|
||||
- collaterals from the reticular formation and from the pyramids enter the inferior olivary nucleus. inputs from rest of ipsilaterl cerebrum
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## LTD plasticity at Purkinje neuron synapses in cerebellum
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.17-3R_copy_39d0f01.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.17</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.17-4R_copy_a110b10.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.17</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* climbing fiber depolarizes Purkinje neuron Vm
|
||||
* parallel fiber synapse weakened
|
||||
* parallel fiber synapse gluatamte transmission is through both AMPA and mGluR receptors. DAG and IP3 acti with Ca2+ flux through climbing fiber activation releasing Ca2+ from ER and activation of PKC which causes internalization of postsynaptic AMPA receptors (weaking the functional conenction between parallel fibers and purkinje neurons)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP)
|
||||
|
||||
<div style="height:250px"><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.18-1R_copy_a2ed25f.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.18, Bi and Poo *J Neurosci* 1998</figcaption></div>
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.18-2R_copy_c76cb60.jpg" height="200px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.18, Bi and Poo *J Neurosci* 1998</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
Note:
|
||||
|
||||
* cultured hippocampal neurons
|
||||
* pre before post gives a EPSP riding (AP induced)
|
||||
* post before pre gives a smaller EPSP amplitude
|
||||
|
||||
* experiments in Bi and Poo done in the presence or absence of D-AP-5 (NMDA-R antagonist) as a control
|
||||
* EPSCs induced by test stimuli (0.03 Hz)
|
||||
* before and after repetitive stimulation of the presynaptic neuron (60 pulses at 1 Hz, marked by the thick arrow), with both neurons held in current clamp
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Found in vivo in barrel cortex, optic tectum, cat visual corte (Y. Dan work) multiple species. Thought to be a unifying princple for plasticity. But debate whether an AP must occur or just sub-threshold activity and role of back-propogating APs in vivo. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3059710/
|
||||
|
||||
STDP in vivo is smaller and more variable than in vitro (more background activity, neuromodulation, intact circuits and physiological milieu) and persists for just 10-15min before begin reversed by ongoing spontaneous activity (Yao and Dan 2001) and evidence for STDP potentiation in cortex is weaker than STDP depression.
|
||||
|
||||
[D. Feldmen book on developing circuit neuroscience](https://books.google.com/books?id=BmdzDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA2006&lpg=PA2006&dq=stdp+in+vivo&source=bl&ots=fof09EmRjo&sig=68IvaSI4uoPSSklDB-5uQ2nFI60&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjclfjyiM_QAhXBECwKHXEHB4wQ6AEIUTAG#v=onepage&q=stdp%20in%20vivo&f=false)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Spike-timing dependent plasticity (STDP)
|
||||
|
||||
<div><img src="figs/Neuroscience5e-Fig-08.18-3R_copy_8026f19.jpg" height="400px"><figcaption>Neuroscience 5e Fig. 8.18, Bi and Poo *J Neurosci* 1998</figcaption></div>
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user